In the times when e-learning is striving forward in terms of technology and popularity are e-learning developers failing organisations with their inability to measure and evaluate learnability; the ease of use of their e-learning platforms?
Don Norman’s opinion, as given above, is supported by Michael Feldstein’s, CEO of Feldstein & Associates, quote:
“Despite the huge and growing numbers of dollars being spent on e-learning, nobody is really checking to see whether the courses being developed are usable and therefore useful. In fact, we don't seem to even have a way to talk about usability in the context of e-learning.”
(eLearn Magazine, 2002)
However, I am inclined to disagree. What is actually being discussed is not the user’s ability to learn and understand the course content. It is suggesting that the way e-learning courses are programmed is difficult for learners to understand how to use them. It is therefore with this point that I disagree.
There is a solid model in place, designed specifically to evaluate the usability and subsequent learnability of software programmes, including e-learning.
The evaluation model we base our software solutions on is the ISO9126 (International Organisation for Standardisation). Set up to facilitate international trade, co-ordination and unification of industrial standards by providing a single set of principles, the ISO9126 looks at the functionality, reliability and efficiency of software packages to ensure areas including usability and learnability are sufficiently met.
However, the model in place is not perfect. Chua and Dyson argue that usability would be better measured if more specific factors were looked at including “consistency, simplicity, legibility and use of colour” (Chua and Dyson, 2004: p.189).
However, I believe that organisations, developing e-learning, are in fact now looking at these additional contributing factors, which is why e-learning platforms are becoming more integral to businesses in the training and development of their staff and indeed the preferred training method as it saves time, expense and the system is easy to use.
Taking our e-learning platform as an example, we only require Silverlight for our software to work, which is installed in the majority of computers as standard. For those which haven’t got the software, it is a case of a minute-long download process, where all users have to do is click a button; so hardly rocket science. And that is pretty much it. Once Silverlight is installed and we have issued you with your log in details you are ready to go. Navigation through courses is also easy and self explanatory by the use of clearly marked and visible buttons.
Usability and learnability co-exist; you cannot have one without the other. As Matt Fuller of E-Cul-De-Sac states:
“It’s not enough to make something easy to learn, if it’s not then easy and efficient to use.” (Fuller, M, 1996-2011).
Therefore, with emphasis being placed on making e-learning the forerunner of simple, easy-to-use and fast training, organisations cannot afford to ignore usability and learnability. If they do it will be glaringly obvious in their over-complicated, incomprehensible e-learning platform.