9. November 2011 10:26

The 14th – 20th November sees the launch by anti-alcohol charity Alcohol Concern of the 'Alcohol Concern Charter', using their annual 'Alcohol Awareness Week' as a platform. The Charter, which they invite us all to sign, calls for a number of things, including "the right to objective and independent information and education on the consequences of alcohol consumption on health, the family and society."

The pity is they don’t live up to their own Charter’s aspirations. Alcohol Concern list as fact a number of highly contentious claims which are based on anything but "objective and independent information". For example they claim as fact:

  • Every hour more than 100 people go into hospital in England and Wales with an alcohol-related condition
  • Every day more than 40 people die as a result of alcohol in England and Wales
The truth is no one actually knows how many alcohol-related hospital admissions there are or how many people die as a result of alcohol in England and Wales. It is simply not the case that a qualified clinician diagnoses and records each and every alcohol-related hospital admission or death, and that the numbers are then collated nationally.

In fact alcohol-related hospital admissions are calculated using a complex mathematical model, developed by the World Health Organisation in 2003, that estimates the disease burden and acute consequences of alcohol consumption through the calculation of something called 'attributable fractions'. The 'attributable fraction' is defined as the proportion of disease risk in a population that would not have occurred, if exposure to a given risk factor (alcohol) had not taken place. So in reality all the figures quoted by Alcohol Concern, about alcohol-related hospital admissions and alcohol-related deaths are simply an estimate calculated from an 11 year-old mathematical model.

Alcohol Concern originated from a split with the Institute of Alcohol Studies, which is a straight-down-the line abolitionist organisation, linked to the International Order of Good Templars that wants a "world free of alcohol and other drugs". Alcohol Concern is campaigning for a “life free from the effects of alcohol harms”. It is difficult in practice to put a piece of paper between these two positions. Although they don’t openly call for the abolition of alcohol they advocate reducing the level of alcohol consumption across the whole population - not just for ‘problem drinkers' - but everyone needs to drink less, so far as they are concerned.

The Coalition Government recently cut off £400,000 of funding provided by the Department for Health, prompting the resignation of Alcohol Concern’s Chief Executive Don Shenker. This follows their rejection of the industry responsibility deal to which government and the drinks’ industry are committed. Alcohol concern rejects any involvement by the drinks’ industry in the formation of alcohol policy as tantamount to supping with the Devil!

Alcohol Awareness Week and the Alcohol Concern Charter are an attempt to plug the funding gap by recruiting grass-roots support. By quoting alarmist and distorted statistics Alcohol Concern hopes to discover an army of cause-oriented activists willing to tilt at windmills. Who knows, a tented city of oh-so-sincere citizens may well be pitched outside a brewery or distillery near you!


11/10/2011 8:24:01 AM #

Phil Mellows

It's not quite true to say that 'Alcohol Concern originated from a split with the Institute of Alcohol Studies'. The split occured on the National Council on Alcoholism in 1982, and led to the post-prohibitionists (as I call them) linked to the Independent Order of Good Templars (ie Derek Rutherford & Co) forming the IAS after they effectively walked out when the NCA chairman said they were a bunch of methodists and he couldn't work with them. The NCA evolved into Alcohol Concern in 1984 with the help of government funding (now withdrawn).
No doubt ousting the hardliners gave Alcohol Concern credibility with the government, but I also think it has different ideological roots to the IAS.

Phil Mellows

11/15/2011 9:05:12 PM #

Outdoor Expert

A really helpfull article - Thank you very much I hope you will not mind me writting about this article on my blog I will also link back to this post Thank you

Outdoor Expert

11/18/2011 1:18:06 PM #


Thank you


3/19/2012 11:44:56 AM #


Thank you for publishing this information. This post is awesome. I really enjoy to read and follow this blog. Thank you


3/19/2012 11:45:13 AM #


Thank you very much for posting this information. This post is amazing. I really love to read and follow this blog. Thank you very much


4/17/2015 10:18:58 AM #

purchase instagram followers and likes

Things i have observed in terms of personal computer memory is always that there are specifications such as SDRAM, DDR and so forth, that must fit in with the technical specs of the motherboard. If the personal computer's motherboard is kind of current while there are no main system issues, updating the memory literally normally requires under an hour. It's one of many easiest personal computer upgrade types of procedures one can imagine. Thanks for sharing your ideas.

purchase instagram followers and likes United States

Add comment

  Country flag
  • Comment
  • Preview

About the author

Paul Chase

Paul Chase is a graduate political economist with over 20 years experience operating licensed retail premises. He is a co-founder of CPL Training and as a Director and Head of UK Compliance is responsible for ensuring that the business targets of this department are delivered to the Board.

Widely acknowledged as a sector expert, Paul is also responsible for compliance course development and works closely with awarding bodies developing and maintaining CPL’s licensed retail sector qualifications. In addition Paul manages a number of key corporate accounts.

Tag cloud